How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

What if you were the only and last person left on Earth. How will you survive and what would you do with your life?

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

For example, Jesus has a God …

I see ugly guys dating gorgeous, "hot" women all the time. I, too, am not very attractive but I'm not doing well with the ladies. What's their secret?

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

There is any scientific evidence that we live in a sphere. Why do others say that we lives in a flat Earth but there is no evidence that they have proven the existence of a flat earth?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: